[English Translations for Global Clients - Success Case]

1. Case Overview

The client was accused of theft, violation of the Postal Service Act, and obstruction of business after allegedly stealing another company’s postal mail upon receiving it.

In reality, the mail was received by mistake during the course of regular business operations, but the opposing party insisted that the client had intentionally stolen the item and sought to hold them criminally liable.

2. Taelim’s Assistance

Taelim Law Firm’s attorneys carefully examined the client’s situation in detail.

They focused on proving that the client’s receipt of the mail resulted from a simple delivery or handling error, not from a lack of legal authority or deliberate theft.

The defense emphasized that there was no intent to steal, conceal, or misuse the mail and that there was no objective evidence to substantiate the alleged criminal conduct.

3. Case Outcome

As a result, the prosecution found insufficient evidence to establish the charges and issued a non-prosecution (no-charge) decision, fully clearing the client of all allegations.

4. Significance of the Case

This case clearly distinguishes between a mere mistake and intentional theft, underscoring the importance of caution in criminalizing inadvertent administrative or procedural errors.

By grounding its defense in factual and objective evidence, Taelim Law Firm successfully demonstrated the absence of intent and obtained a no-charge decision for the client.

The case serves as a practical example for individuals wrongfully accused of crimes arising from workplace misunderstandings or accidental conduct, reaffirming the value of precise fact-based defense strategies.

**

If you’re facing a similar situation,

don’t hesitate to reach out to Taelim Law Firm for legal assistance.